Carragher calls for Liverpool to show derby spirit to end Arsenal jinx

• ‘It’s important that we keep the feelgood factor’
• Liverpool have not won at Arsenal for over 10 years

Jamie Carragher believes Liverpool can increase Arsenal’s troubles with their first win at the Emirates Stadium tomorrow night and admits Rafael Benítez’s team must not squander the initiative provided by victory in the Merseyside derby.

Liverpool returned to the top four for the first time since October with Saturday’s 10-man defeat of Everton and can close the gap on Arsenal to just two points with victory at the Emirates.

They have not won at Arsenal in 10 years, when Titi Camara scored in a 1‑0 win at Highbury, but head to London on the back of 17 points from a possible 21 and four consecutive clean sheets. Liverpool’s recent displays have been ­spirited rather than scintillating but Carragher believes confidence has been restored by the manner of victory in the 213th Merseyside derby and that, even with Arsenal and Manchester City away to come, Benítez’s side can strengthen their claims to Champions League qualification.

“In one sense it is more than three points because everyone was buzzing in the dressing room on Saturday, but that can quickly change if we don’t build on the result,” said Carragher. “It’s important that we keep the feelgood factor that we’ve got until after the Arsenal game, and if that is to happen we’ll have to make sure we get a good result. Arsenal have been at the Emirates for a couple of years and I don’t think we’ve had a win there yet. So it’s something we’re going to have to do sooner or later and hopefully Wednesday will be the time. We’re going into it in a great frame of mind, but Arsenal is always a difficult game.”

Sotirios Kyrgiakos will start a three-match suspension tomorrow as a result of his dismissal in the derby but Steven ­Gerrard, echoing Carragher’s sentiments, believes the Everton result can be the foundation for an improved run of form.

The Liverpool captain said: “Arsenal away is always tough but we have used beating Everton as a platform in the past and we’ve got to do it again. We want to extend our run and go on to better things. We know there is a long way to go and we want to make sure we are in the top four at the end of the season.

“It’s performances like Everton that will get you in there. We have got to try and keep this run going, as we can’t afford any slip-ups. There is pressure coming from Tottenham, Manchester City and Aston Villa. There are a couple of very tough games coming up but if we can show what we have done in the last six games, I don’t see why we can’t maintain it.”

LiverpoolArsenalPremier LeagueSteven GerrardAndy Hunterguardian.co.uk

Rafael Benítez states the obvious: debt is damaging Liverpool | David Conn

The manager’s remarks about Liverpool’s finances may not be earth-shattering but at least someone senior is acknowledging the truth

Byline

Rafael Benítez says Liverpool are in debt: shock, astonishment, clear the back page. The manager says Liverpool must reduce this debt and so do not have millions of pounds to spend buying players: astonishing and extraordinary.

Benítez has shocked us, in truth, with a statement of the bleedin’ obvious, but it is noteworthy that somebody in his position has finally come out and said it. Being taken over by two North American businessmen, who loaded on to the club the £174m they borrowed for their takeover, was not, after all, the most glorious event in the history of a great football club.

When Tom Hicks and George Gillett arrived, they portrayed themselves as the friendly and benevolent Americans, smiling humans compared with the odd-seeming Glazers of Tampa Bay and Old Trafford. They were not going to “do” a Glazer and load debt on to the club; they would build the new stadium on Stanley Park, which would allow Liverpool truly to compete with United; they would honour and respect Liverpool’s heritage.

Yet a skim-read of the official documents that accompanied their takeover blew away their claims to benevolence. They were in fact visiting the same awful trick on Liverpool as the Glazers did at Manchester United, just in a lower key.

The Glazers bought the world’s richest and arguably most glory-drenched football club for £831m, of which £559m was borrowed, £275m of it from hedge funds at eye-watering interest rates. The club itself, which had Sir Alex Ferguson, his conveyor belt of talent, the resources to expand Old Trafford to an opponent-busting 76,000 and cash in the bank, was itself loaded with the maddening responsibility to service repayment of those borrowings. In the three years to 2008 the club has incurred £263m in interest charges alone but the total debt has actually risen to £700m.

At United Ferguson has never truly acknowledged that monstrosity, which alienated many fans, led to a breakaway club, FC United of Manchester, being formed and produced the mass leakage of money once the Glazers arrived. Those interest payments have pushed the world’s most profitable club into losses every year since the takeover and the £81m received for Cristiano Ronaldo has patently not been spent on players or anything else.

United, however, reject the suggestion that £700m of debt has adversely affected the club financially in any way; they argue that the club makes so much money there is some for Ferguson to spend but he has not wanted to.

At Liverpool the debts are lower but the club can ill afford them because of Anfield’s smaller capacity, not a brick of the new stadium having materialised almost three years after Hicks and Gillett arrived. Their latest figures showed the club had borrowed £313m, including the costs of the original takeover, and last year paid out £36.5m to the banks in interest alone – that is Xabi Alonso plus £6.5m, gone. That helped push the club into a £42.6m loss at a time when vastly more wealth is flowing in than ever before.

Benítez now acknowledges this debt is a problem, and the need to reduce it has eaten into his transfer budget. This is not a revelation that qualifies as earth-shattering; it simply states what has been horribly plain all along. These “leveraged buy-outs” were not mystical, transatlantic, financial wizardry for which the clubs and their fans should be grateful. They were speculators’ devices which smothered the clubs in mountainous, pointless debt.

The only news here is that somebody senior has finally said it, and that is a relief.

Rafael BenítezLiverpoolPremier LeagueDavid Connguardian.co.uk

Arsène Wenger and Rafael Benítez battle a growing divide | Dominic Fifield

Liverpool’s match with Arsenal is unlikely to affect the title race; Chelsea and Manchester United have far more options

The Premier League will reverberate this weekend to a thunderous collision on Merseyside, yet those at the top will register the claps only as distant rumblings. Liverpool and Arsenal had hoped for so much more than also-ran status this season but, even before Christmas, theirs is a distant pursuit. Arsène Wenger spoke yesterday of his team’s “fate” depending on victory at Anfield. Already there is a desperate feel to the chase.

The gap from Chelsea at the top stands this morning at eight points for Arsenal and 12 for Liverpool, languishing in seventh. The leaders and the champions, Manchester United, have awkward but winnable home games today that could see them widen the divide from the other members of the perceived elite quartet prior to tomorrow afternoon’s kick-off. Wenger and Rafael Benítez must wonder how it came to this.

Publicly they remain defiant. Wenger maintained that the title will be won with “between 78 and 83 points”, potentially the lowest tally since Arsenal claimed the league in 1998. The days of the champions losing only once, or not at all, have gone. “There are no teams of the quality [of Arsenal's Invincibles or Chelsea under Jose Mourinho],” he said. “When Chelsea beat us I said they’d drop points and everyone said, ‘This guy has completely lost the plot.’ One week later they lost at Manchester City. They will lose more, don’t worry.”

What is less certain is whether Arsenal or Liverpool are equipped to take advantage. The familiar criticism aimed at Wenger and Benítez is that their sides lack a Plan B when contests, such as Arsenal’s home drubbing by Chelsea, run away from them. The term Plan B conjures images of long-ball football with which neither of these sides would feel comfortable. Indeed, the nearest any of the elite four come to the longer game would be Petr Cech’s occasional punts towards Didier Drogba – an exceptional player who allies pace and power, height and aggression – to ruffle centre-halves in the air. Even they consider that a shock tactic.

Arsenal’s midfield boasts too much quality to be bypassed. Liverpool, particularly when Alberto Aquilani is fit and featuring, will move the ball quicker in short, sharp bursts over the turf – as they did for a while against Fiorentina in midweek – to liberate their greatest assets, Steven Gerrard and Fernando Torres. Without the Italian their build-up is prone to be stodgy with Gerrard, who has managed only four goals this term (two of which were penalties), too often crowded out by opponents granted time to regroup.

Yet if Arsenal and Liverpool are comfortable in their particular styles of play, they lack depth of variety in personnel. Where United boast three distinct kinds of forward in Dimitar Berbatov, Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney, Arsenal can point only to Robin Van Persie for established goalscoring prowess alongside a number of diminutive, tricky attackers in the mould of Andrey Arshavin. The champions can employ out-and-out wingers and stretch the play, or opt for massed midfield aggression as they did recently at Stamford Bridge, and boast the experience of Ryan Giggs or Paul Scholes to squeeze them out of tricky situations.

Chelsea have similarly impressive options. Carlo Ancelotti’s diamond can feature one of four – Frank Lampard, Joe Cole, Deco, even Gaël Kakuta – at its tip, or real width in Florent Malouda and Cole. Their lack of a third pedigree forward may be addressed next month and, if matters really become desperate, there is always the tried and tested option of moving Michael Essien, when fit, to right-back to maraud up the flank.

Liverpool and Arsenal’s alternatives are all too similar, their game-plans rather too rigid as injuries deprive their squad of key players. Wenger has lost his three tallest forward-thinkers to injury – Van Persie, Nicklas Bendtner and Abou Diaby – and, at times, Benítez has been stripped of his best two attackers. The voids have not been filled effectively. “Last season we were playing 4-2-3-1 and scored more than anyone in the division,” said Benítez. “We started this season scoring a lot of goals but conceding more. People said we had to do better in defence. Then we keep three clean sheets and people say we have to score more goals.

“How do you win? Balance, defending well and attacking well as we did in the past. But it is not easy when you have to change your defenders in every single game and you cannot play your best attackers. When everyone is available we will be much better.” By then, Liverpool’s chance of a first league title since 1990 will surely have gone, if it has not already.

Wenger would point to similar handicaps with injuries to his only natural centre-forwards as he sticks to a 4-3-3 that had prompted an early avalanche of goals. Cesc Fábregas called for a “different kind of option” up front last week to complement the numerous players Arsenal possess capable of dribbling dangerously around the penalty area. His manager readily agreed with the sentiment but would argue the solutions are currently in the treatment room. “We have money to spend but we haven’t found what we want,” Wenger said. “Ideally, I’d just want our injured players back. I would not buy any players if we had no injuries. The real question is: can we win as we are now? Yes we can.”

Yet for all that Benítez and Wenger passionately believe that, at full strength, their teams could win the Premier League, the reality remains that their squads do not have the variety or depth of experience of the top two. In that context, their pursuit might feel forlorn. “You fight against a team like Chelsea who can afford to lose £150m,” added Wenger. “We have to fight them and beat them while making money ourselves.

“Even so I am convinced that my team have the physical and mental qualities to cope at this level. We scored an own- goal and lost at United and nothing had indicated we would lose that game [up to then]. Against Chelsea for 40 minutes I never felt we would lose. Never. Now we want to show that those were two accidents. And we know our fate depends on that.”

Premier LeagueArsenalLiverpoolArsène WengerRafael BenítezDominic Fifieldguardian.co.uk