Watch Liverpool

Posts Tagged ‘council’

• Fourth-round FA Cup tie heightens tensions
• Clubs to receive written reminders about conduct

The Football Association will contact Liverpool and Manchester United to remind both clubs of their responsibilities ahead of a potentially explosive FA

Will it be second time lucky for detailed proposals to spread the success of Liverpool and Everton FCs into their needy surroundings?

Supporters of Liverpool’s rival clubs are having a second go at a joint attempt to create a ‘Football Quarter’ between their famous stadia at Anfield and Goodison Park.

Rebuffed in 2010, the reds and blues have come back with more detailed proposals and a good line-up of imaginative supporters including Peter Hooton, who featured in the Northerner’s look at The End fanzine last week.

They want to get developers seriously interested in some 40 acres of land in the area whose many existing assets include not only Liverpool and Everton themselves but Stanley Park with its recently-restored Gladstone Conservatory and a curious European record: the playground with the most number of swings for grown-ups.

There are 45 of them on a site designed in the shape of the World Cup – a promising omen for the new suggestions about a Football Quarter. These include a football museum which would neutrally promote the glories of both clubs and a ‘fan zone’ for events on match days and sports-related exhibitions and the like on others.

The concept was outlined this week at a launch with Hooton and others speaking, under the joint aegis of the supporters’ groups Keeping Everton In Our City (KEIOC) and Spirit of Shankly. Their working title as a combined operation is All Together Now and they have kept up close liaison with Liverpool city council and Liverpool university.

The proposals are designed to fit in with the council strategic regeneration framework for North Liverpool and have the blessing of the two Labour MPs whose constituencies are involved, Steve Rotherham from Walton and Joe Benton of Bootle. They have issued this joint statement:

The areas around Anfield and Goodison Park are recognised as among the most deprived in the UK, whilst at the same time, the communities there are characterised by their unique spirit, tenacity, warmth and entrepreneurial potential. We have a collective duty to ensure that the areas in the vicinity of both Anfield and Goodison Park capitalise on the regeneration potential and reflect the world-renowned status of both clubs.
 

Colin Fitzpatrick of KEIOC says:

I believe football clubs should be an asset of their communities – Everton is known as ‘The People’s Club’, and injects more than £10million into the local economy throughout the season. They carry out incredible work through the award-winning Everton in the Community programme. The Football Quarter is designed to complement and build on these achievements for the benefit of fans, their communities, and the club’s prosperity.
 

Dr Paul Gardner of Spirit of Shankly and Liverpool University says:

As All Together Now, both KEIOC and SoS want to work with the clubs, the city council, the community and the private sector in delivering the Football Quarter. This is an area characterised by beautiful and historical Victorian parkland, anchored by two great clubs with magnificent 21st century football stadia. The Football Quarter will reflect their unique histories and presence in world football and transform the lives of thousands of fans living in some of the most deprived parts of the UK. It is vital that this programme is supported.

The ideas also include a park-and-ride scheme between Walton and central Liverpool and an ‘educational hub’ supported by all three universities in Liverpool. The local Daily Post has come out in favour, albeit with this ‘about time too’ tag:

It has perhaps always been slightly worrying that two multi-million pound turnover Premier League football clubs ply their trade in a community so manifestly neglected, with little evidence that Liverpool’s and Everton’s successes have provided any spin-off benefits for the surrounding neighbourhood.

It can only now be hoped that the Football Quarter initiative does something worthwhile to redress this balance.

LiverpoolLiverpoolLiverpoolLiverpool Hope UniversityLiverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity of LiverpoolEvertonLocal governmentRegenerationMartin Wainwrightguardian.co.uk

• Criticism of Hillsborough families branded ‘disgraceful’
• Retired judge told them to drop ‘conspiracy theories’

A survivor of the 1985 fire at Bradford City in which 56 people died has profoundly criticised the judge who conducted the official inquiry into that disaster and who this week unfavourably compared the response of families bereaved by the Hillsborough disaster to those of Bradford.

Mr Justice Popplewell said in a letter to The Times that the Hillsborough families are “harbouring conspiracy theories’” rather than behaving with “quiet dignity and great courage” like the Bradford families did.

Martin Fletcher was 12 when he emerged alive from Valley Parade’s inferno, but his father John, older brother Andrew, grandfather Eddie and uncle Peter, with whom he had been attending the Third Division match between Bradford City and Lincoln City, all died. He was also at the FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough four years later, at which 96 Liverpool supporters died.

“For Popplewell to say that the Hillsborough families are ‘harbouring conspiracy theories’ while the Bradford families ‘organised a sensible compensation scheme and moved on,’ is an absolute travesty of the truth and a disgrace,” Fletcher said.

“I have many unanswered questions still about the fire in which four of my family died, as does my mother. Popplewell’s report was nowhere close to the quality of Lord Justice Taylor’s report after Hillsborough, and since reading it as an adult I have always been very disappointed in it and considered it a poor piece of work.

“Rather than lecture the Hillsborough families not to ask questions, the judge should ask himself why, after a disaster caused by a negligent approach to safety at football, despite his report, standards in football were allowed to remain so lamentably poor that another disaster happened at Hillsborough just four years later.”

Fletcher, now an accountant, also wholly rejected Popplewell’s assertion that “a sensible compensation scheme” was organised after Bradford. In fact, there was a charitable disaster appeal, no organised compensation scheme, and his mother, Susan, took a negligence action, which she had to fund herself, against the club and Yorkshire County Council, for its safety oversight of Valley Parade.

In the high court, both were found to have been negligent in allowing litter to build up over many years under the void of the club’s wooden main stand, and to have done nothing to clear it despite explicit written warnings that it was a fire risk. Two years later, the club was found two-thirds liable, the council one third.

Popplewell, in his report, wrote that his task was “not to allocate blame,” and he was sympathetic to the club, saying that lower division football was “run on shoestring”.

That season Bradford City, owned by the motor trade entrepreneur Jack Tordoff and chairman Stafford Heginbotham, fielded a side good enough to win the Third Division championship, while doing little safety or maintenance work on the ground.

After the fire, Valley Parade was rebuilt with public grants and insurance money, and Popplewell himself returned to Bradford to open it. Shortly afterwards, Heginbotham and Tordoff sold their shares in the club at a profit.

Fletcher has spent years in his 20s and 30s trying to understand the disaster, including a detailed reading of Popplewell’s report and the evidence given to the inquiry, which has left him deeply dissatisfied.

The judge held his inquiry just over three weeks after the fire, and it lasted little more than a week. After Hillsborough, the West Midlands police force was appointed to independently investigate, three months were spent gathering evidence and Taylor heard arguments in detail in his inquiry over several weeks.

Taylor’s report clearly identified who was to blame and how the disaster happened, which the bereaved Hillsborough families are able to point to 22 years later, in their fight to understand why nobody in authority took responsibility, with South Yorkshire police instead blaming the disaster on supporters.

Fletcher argues Popplewell’s inquiry was too quick, he believes there should have been an independent investigating police force brought in, and he is frustrated by what he feels is Popplewell’s failure to allocate responsibility clearly.

“He stated that a discarded cigarette was the likely cause, but never identified the smoker or detailed the circumstances in which that happened. Nor did he properly expose and allocate blame for the scale of negligence which lay behind the disaster.”

Fletcher, who had family in Bradford but grew up in Nottingham, was in the Forest end at Hillsborough.

“I cried after that, in my mother’s car, asking why, as people had survived at Bradford because there were no fences in front of the main stand, there were still fences up at football grounds four years later. Popplewell made precious few useful safety recommendations, and instead, soon after that, football supporters were going to have an identity card-type scheme imposed on them.

“Taylor, after Hillsborough, emphatically insisted that football must be forced by legislation wholly to improve its safety culture. Popplewell did no such thing after Bradford, and when he talks about ‘moving on,’ yes, supporters moved on to another disaster, in which 96 people were killed.

“He should be asking himself some searching questions, rather than lecture the families bereaved by the Hillsborough disaster that they should just accept it.

“In all these years, Popplewell has never spoken to me or my mother, who lost four family members. He should not presume to speak on our behalf. Perhaps he should act with ‘quiet dignity’ himself.”

Hillsborough disasterBradfordLiverpoolDavid Connguardian.co.uk